Over 3,907 organizations now manage $1.571 trillion in impact investing assets under management worldwide, according to Global Impact Investing Network estimates.
That figure reflects a 21 percent compound annual growth rate since 2019, but the more consequential shift lies not in volume but in structure. Capital once deployed through informal networks and trust-based relationships now flows through institutional channels demanding auditable governance, standardized reporting, and third-party verification.
Sheikh Ahmed Dalmook Al Maktoum, Chairman of Inmā Emirates Holdings, recently restructured a decade-long private family office into an institutional holding company headquartered in Dubai. The reorganization responds to a specific market constraint: pension funds, endowments, and sovereign wealth vehicles cannot co-invest alongside structures lacking formal investment committees, independent oversight, and externally validated impact assessments.
The Structural Gap Institutionalization Addresses
Gulf family offices historically excelled at bilateral deal-making precisely because they operated outside institutional constraints. Decisions moved quickly, relationships substituted for due diligence committees, and flexibility enabled creative structuring that rigid institutional mandates could not accommodate.
This model fails when family offices seek to scale through co-investment. A $50 million port concession can proceed on relationship capital, but a $500 million infrastructure program requiring pension fund participation cannot. Institutional allocators face fiduciary obligations, regulatory scrutiny, and board-level accountability that demand documented processes regardless of counterparty reputation.
Nearly 50,000 European companies must now publish audited impact metrics under the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive. ESG-focused institutional investments are projected to reach $33.9 trillion by 2026, comprising 21.5 percent of global assets under management, per KEY ESG analysis. Capital at this scale requires standardized interfaces: governance frameworks that translate relationship-driven deal flow into formats institutional compliance departments can process.
How Sheikh Ahmed Dalmook Al Maktoum Structures Governance for Scale
Inmā operates under an investment committee with independent oversight and publishes project-specific performance indicators subject to external validation. Metrics track service delivery uptime, employment generated, and environmental outcomes, benchmarks that match development finance institution frameworks and enable direct comparison with competing capital sources.
Such architecture serves a specific function: it makes Gulf impact capital fungible with institutional money. A Dutch pension fund evaluating emerging market infrastructure exposure can now assess Inmā-structured deals using the same criteria applied to IFC or African Development Bank co-financing opportunities. The governance wrapper, not the underlying asset or geography, determines institutional accessibility.
The 50-year Karachi Port Trust concession with Abu Dhabi Ports illustrates this dynamic. Long-duration infrastructure assets generate predictable cash flows institutional investors require, while governance frameworks provide the audit trails their compliance functions demand.
The 94 Percent Performance Metric
GIIN’s 2024 Impact Investor Survey found that 94 percent of respondents reported both financial and impact performance meeting expectations, a data point that addresses the persistent assumption that impact investments require concessionary returns.
The implications extend beyond marketing into fiduciary territory. Institutional allocators operating under fiduciary duty cannot accept below-market returns regardless of social benefit, which historically confined impact investing to philanthropic carve-outs or ESG-specific mandates with lower return thresholds. The 94 percent figure permits impact investments to compete for general allocation alongside conventional asset classes.
Sheikh Ahmed Dalmook Al Maktoum structures investments around four thematic pillars that function as both screening criteria and measurement frameworks:
Public-sector modernization: Digital infrastructure and governance systems that improve state capacity
Private enterprise development: Commercial ventures generating employment and tax revenue
Environmental sustainability: Clean energy and climate-resilient infrastructure
Community inclusion: Projects expanding access to essential services
Institutional partners can map these categories onto their own sustainability mandates and report outcomes through existing ESG disclosure channels.
Blended Finance and Risk-Return Calculations
Blended finance structures combine concessional capital from development institutions with commercial tranches from private investors. Development finance institutions absorb first-loss positions or provide guarantees that shift risk-adjusted returns into ranges acceptable to commercial capital, fundamentally altering project economics.
Multilateral development banks and DFIs co-financed approximately 30 percent of private investment in low- and middle-income country infrastructure during 2024, per Delphos analysis, while MDBs mobilized a record $137 billion in climate finance for emerging markets that same year. Each concessional dollar deployed through these structures mobilizes multiples of private financing that would otherwise remain in developed market assets.
Over 50 percent of private infrastructure investment in 2024 was classified as green, led by renewable energy projects. Emerging Africa & Asia Infrastructure Fund blends donor-backed capital, DFI support, and private investment to finance solar, wind, and grid projects that individual capital sources could not underwrite alone. When Gulf investors adopt comparable governance standards, competitive dynamics shift: projects previously dependent on DFI participation gain alternative capital sources, and DFIs themselves gain co-investment partners who bring both capital and regional relationships unavailable through traditional development finance channels.
What Constraints Limit Institutional Deployment?
Two primary constraints limit the pace of institutional capital deployment into impact investments:
Standardized metrics: Without universally accepted measurement frameworks, institutional investors cannot compare impact opportunities or verify fund manager claims against consistent benchmarks. GIIN’s IRIS system and emerging ESRS standards address this gap, but adoption remains uneven across geographies and asset classes.
Liquidity: Impact investments typically involve illiquid assets like infrastructure, real estate, and private companies that institutional portfolios can accommodate only in limited quantities. Secondary markets for impact assets remain underdeveloped, constraining capital recycling and limiting total allocation capacity.
Inmā’s focus on revenue-generating infrastructure partially addresses both constraints. Port concessions and power plants produce measurable outputs like container throughput and megawatt-hours delivered that translate directly into performance metrics, while long-duration concessions provide predictable exit timelines that substitute for liquid secondary markets.
Implications for Emerging Market Capital Access
Institutionalization of impact investing creates a new financing layer between traditional development assistance and commercial project finance, one that offers emerging market governments access to capital without the conditionality of multilateral lending or the return thresholds of purely commercial investment.
Western official development assistance contracted by 9 percent in 2024, marking the first decline in six years per OECD data. Alternative capital sources fill an expanding gap, and Gulf investors with operational track records and government relationships can participate in this space, provided they demonstrate credibility through governance frameworks that institutional partners require.
The open question is velocity. Institutional capital seeking impact exposure exceeds the supply of investment-ready opportunities meeting governance standards, creating a bottleneck at the project preparation stage rather than the capital formation stage. Family offices that institutionalize early gain first-mover access to co-investment opportunities and the relationship capital that accumulates from successful joint deployments. Sheikh Ahmed Dalmook Al Maktoum’s restructuring of Inmā Emirates Holdings offers a template for how Gulf capital can bridge this gap by converting relationship-based deal flow into institutional-grade investment products.
Read more:
How Sheikh Ahmed Dalmook Al Maktoum Models the Institutional Turn in Impact Investing
